Current:Home > MarketsTreasury proposes rule to prevent large corporations from evading income taxes -Aspire Money Growth
Treasury proposes rule to prevent large corporations from evading income taxes
View
Date:2025-04-15 07:40:21
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration on Thursday proposed a new rule that would require the largest U.S. companies to pay at least 15% of their profits in taxes.
Treasury Department officials estimate that about 100 of the biggest corporations — those with at least $1 billion in annual profits — would be forced to pay more in taxes under a provision that was included in the administration’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Democratic members of Congress, including Elizabeth Warren, a senator from Massachusetts, have urged the White House to implement the tax.
Similar to the alternative minimum tax that applies to mostly wealthier individuals, the corporate AMT seeks to ensure that large corporations can’t use tax loopholes and exceptions avoid paying little or no taxes on extensive profits.
The tax is a key plank administration’s’ “agenda to make the biggest corporations and wealthiest pay their fair share,” the Treasury Department said.
Treasury officials said Thursday that the AMT would raise $250 billion in tax revenue over the next decade. Without it, Treasury estimates that the largest 100 companies would pay just 2.6% of their profits in taxes, including 25 that would pay no taxes at all.
Former President Donald Trump has promised to get rid of the corporate AMT if he is elected. As president, Trump signed legislation in 2017 that cut the corporate tax rate to 21% from 35%. He now says he supports reducing the corporate rate further, to 15%.
In a letter this summer to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, Warren and three congressional colleagues cited research that found that in the five years following Trump’s corporate tax cut, 55 large corporations reported $670 billion in profits, but paid less than 5% in taxes.
Treasury’s proposed rule will be open for comment until Dec. 12, the department said, and there will be a proposed hearing on the rule Jan. 16.
veryGood! (5478)
Related
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- How elections forecasters became political ‘prophets’
- Teen Mom’s Ryan Edwards and Girlfriend Amanda Conner Expecting First Baby Together
- Deadspin loses bid to toss defamation suit over article accusing young Chiefs fan of racism
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Who can vote in US elections, and what steps must you take to do so?
- As FEMA prepares for Hurricane Milton, it battles rumors surrounding Helene recovery
- Angel Dreamer Wealth Society: Empowering the Future, Together with Angel Dreamer
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Harris proposes expanding Medicare to cover in-home senior care
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- TikTok Influencer Stuck on Disney Cruise During Hurricane Milton
- How will Hurricane Milton stack up against other major recent storms?
- Colleen Hoover's 'Reminders of Him' is getting a movie adaptation: Reports
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Autopsy reveals cause of death for pregnant teen found slain in Georgia woods this summer
- NFL power rankings Week 6: Commanders among rising teams led by rookie quarterback
- Education Pioneer Wealth: Charity First
Recommendation
Trump's 'stop
Flags fly at half-staff for Voyageurs National Park ranger who died in water rescue
Why Wait? These October Prime Day 2024 Deals Make Great Christmas Gifts & Start at Just $4
The AP has called winners in elections for more than 170 years. Here’s how it’s done
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
On a screen near you: Officials are livestreaming the election process for more transparency
Philadelphia judge receives unpaid suspension for his political posts on Facebook
Courts could see a wave of election lawsuits, but experts say the bar to change the outcome is high